ALOK GUPTA,LUCKNOW vs. ASSESSING AUTHORITY , NFAC

The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and enjoying income from charging coupon, related to mobiles and telecommunication. The assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 21/11/2014 declaring total income at Rs.22,80,130/- The Assessing Officer completed the assessment and passed assessment order on 22/03/2022 u/s 147 read with section 144/144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) and determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.4,02,80,130/- by making addition of Rs.3,80,00,000/- under section 68 of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal in the office of learned CIT(A). Vide impugned order dated 18/11/2024, the assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the learned CIT(A).

Being aggrieved, the assessee has filed the present appeal in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the aforesaid impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A). In the course of appellate proceedings in ITAT, learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) has passed order without affording sufficient time and opportunity to the assessee. The learned AR for the assessee further submitted that the learned CIT(A) failed to pass a speaking order on merits and dismissed the assessee’s appeal in a summary manner for violation of the provisions u/s 250(6) of the Act. He further submitted that the learned CIT(A) is duty bound u/s 250(6) of the IT Act to pass a speaking order on various grounds of appeal, on merits, but learned CIT(A) failed to do so. In view of the foregoing, learned AR for the assessee submitted, the impugned order of learned CIT(A) should be set aside and the issue in dispute should be restored to the file of learned CIT(A) with the direction to pass fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.