BASANT KUMAR MISHRA, KORBA,KORBA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 72/RPR/2026Status: HeardITAT Raipur19 March 2026AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)/NFAC, as a quasi-judicial authority, erred by not considering the additional evidence without cogent reasons. It set aside the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC and remanded both the quantum and penalty appeals back for fresh consideration, with directions to admit and consider the additional evidence and issue a speaking order.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against the orders of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Ld. CIT(A) had rejected the admission of additional evidence, specifically a claim for expenses of Rs. 21,49,846/-, under Rule 46A, on the grounds that the assessee had ample opportunity during original assessment proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC was justified in rejecting additional evidence under Rule 46A, and if a quasi-judicial authority is obligated to consider all relevant evidence for a just decision.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 46A,Section 250(4),Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR

Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Yash Dhariwal, CA
For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Hearing: 19.03.2026Pronounced: 19.03.2026

PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The captioned appeals preferred by the assessee emanates from the respective orders of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 13.11.2025 & 14.11.2025 for the assessment year 2018-19 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2.

At the very outset, it is noted that the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC vide Para 6.5.1 had not accepted the additional evidences observing as follows:

“6.5.1 A

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 46A

All 520 judgments and leading authorities on Section 46A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →