MALL HOTEL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted the disallowance on power and fuel expenses, noting that the income from power charges received from tenants exceeded the expenditure. Similarly, the disallowance on repair and maintenance expenses was deleted as the expenses were incurred against common area maintenance charges received, which were treated as business income.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Mall Hotel Ltd., engaged in hotel and cinema business, faced additions for power & fuel expenses and building repair expenses. The Assessing Officer disallowed a portion of these expenses, which was partly sustained by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of power & fuel expenses and building repair expenses is justified when income from tenants covers these costs and is treated as business income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, E: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, HON’BLE JUDICIAL & SMT. RENU JAUHRI, HON’BLE
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER RENU JAUHRI:
The above captioned three appeals are filed by the assessee against orders of Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi, dated 18.06.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income
ITA_5061_5062_5063_Mall Hotel Ltd Delhi
Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as, “Act”]. The assessments were framed by the Ld. AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 r.w.s 144B of the Act.
In all these three appeals, identical grounds have been taken and, therefore, these are being disposed off vide a comm
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026