PAKIJA,MUKTSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-3, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given adequate opportunity by the Ld. CIT(A) and was prevented by sufficient cause from attending the proceedings. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the Ld. CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing a reasonable opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order of the Ld. CIT(A) which sustained the AO's assessment. The AO had completed the assessment under Section 143(3) making additions under Sections 69 and 69A. The assessee had not prosecuted the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
िनधा�रती क� ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A राज�व क� ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 06/01/2025 उदघोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 20/01/2025 आदेश/Order
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana dt. 28/06/2024 pertaining to Assessment Year 2019-2000.
Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed under section 143(3) vide order dt. 28/07/2021 wherein the AO assessed the total income at Rs. 33,94,592/- by making addition of Rs 25,00,000/- u/s 69 and Rs 6,34,592/- under section 69A of the Act. Thereafter, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has since sustained the said order on account of non-prosecution on behalf of the assessee. Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us.
During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. It was 2 submitted that though initial notices were received and assessee sought time to file necessary explanation /documentation, however, subsequent notices so issued by him were not served on the assessee and therefore, the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause for not attending to the proceedings before CIT(A). It was submitted that assessee be allowed one last opportunity and the matter may be remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh and it was submitted that the assessee shall attend to the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) and file the necessary information/documentation.
Per contra, the Ld. DR submitted that various notices have been served upon the assessee but assessee has failed to represent his case before the Ld. CIT(A).
After hearing both the parties and perusing the material available on the record, I find that the assessee deserves one last opportunity and cannot be condemned unheard and therefore, keeping in view principles of substantial justice, the matter is remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order pronounced in the open Court on 20/01/2025 )
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026