M/S BAJRANG FURNITURE,KAITHAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 273/CHANDI/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 January 2025AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and admitted it. The Tribunal found that the assessee deserved one last opportunity and should not be condemned unheard.

What were the facts?

A survey was conducted where the assessee surrendered Rs. 3,00,00,000, which was offered in the return. The AO treated this surrendered income under the head 'Income from other sources' under Section 115BBE and completed the assessment. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal due to non-prosecution.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal due to non-prosecution without providing adequate opportunity, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 133A,Section 115BBE,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Karnal dt. 26/02/2020 pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay in filing the present appeal. After considering the material available on the record, the delay is hereby condoned and the appeal of the assessee is admitted for adjudication.

3.

Briefly the facts of the case are that survey action under 133A was carried out at the premises of the assessee wherein the assessee surrendered a sum of Rs 3,00,00,000/- and subsequently, the same was offered in the return of income filed on 16/10/2016 declaring an income of Rs 3,02,87,420/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO held that the income so surrendered is liable to be brought to tax under the head “Income from other sources” in view of the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act and the assessment was accordingly completed under section 143(3) vide order dt. 31/12/2018. Thereafter, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) where as part of its ground of appeal, the assessee challenged the order so passed by the AO on an invalid return of income as well as on merits of the case. The ld CIT(A) however, dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of non- prosecution, and being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us.

4.

During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. It was submitted that the notices so issued by him were not served on the assessee and therefore, the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause for not attending to the proceedings before CIT(A). It was submitted that assessee be allowed one last opportunity and the matter may be remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh and it was submitted that the assessee shall attend to the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) and file the necessary information/documentation.

5.

Per contra, the Ld. DR relied on the order of the lower authorities.

6.

After hearing both the parties and perusing the material available on the record, we find that the assessee deserves one last opportunity and cannot be condemned unheard and therefore, keeping in view principles of substantial justice, the matter is remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

7.

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 133A

All 5,893 judgments and leading authorities on Section 133A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →