JAI KUMAR,YAMUNA NAGAR, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, YAMUNANAGAR, YAMUNA NAGAR, HARYANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that there was reasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeal and that the assessee was not given adequate opportunity by the CIT(A). Therefore, the matter is remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing a proper opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147, adding Rs. 27,80,000/- for cash deposits from undisclosed sources under Section 69. The CIT(A) sustained this order ex-parte due to the assessee's non-prosecution, which the assessee appealed, claiming insufficient notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee, justifying remitting the matter for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
िनधा�रती क� ओर से/Assessee by : Shri B.M. Monga, Advocate Shri Rohit Kaura, Advocate राज�व क� ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 04/02/2025 उदघोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 19/02/2025 आदेश/Order
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dt. 19/06/2023 pertaining to Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay in filing the present appeal. After considering the material available on the record and hearing both the parties, I find that there was reasonable cause for the delay in filing the present appeal. The delay is hereby condoned and the appeal of the assessee is admitted for adjudication.
Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide order dt. 22/12/2018 wherein addition of Rs. 27,80,000/- being made in the income of the assessee on account of cash deposit from undisclosed sources under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thereafter, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has 2 since sustained the said order on account of non-prosecution on behalf of the assessee.
Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. It was submitted that the notices so issued by him has not been served on the assessee and therefore, the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause for not attending to the proceedings before CIT(A). It was submitted that assessee be allowed one last opportunity and the matter may be remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh and it was submitted that the assessee shall attend to the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) and file the necessary information/documentation.
Per contra, the Ld. DR submitted that there have been sufficient opportunity provided to the assessee.
After hearing both the parties and perusing the material available on the record, I find that the assessee deserves one last opportunity and cannot be condemned unheard and therefore, keeping in view principles of substantial justice, the matter is remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order pronounced in the open Court on 19/02/2025)
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026