KUVAWALLA DRILL EQUIPMENT,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 14 (1), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1374/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 August 2022AY 2010-114 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated without an independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer, rendering them bad in law. Consequently, the assessment order was annulled.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing drilling equipment, had its assessment reopened based on information about purchases from hawala dealers. The Assessing Officer made additions on account of these purchases.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer. The secondary issue was the consequent levy of penalty.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mecwan
For Respondent: Shri S. P. Walimbe
Hearing: 03.08.2022Pronounced: 22.08.2022

ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: These are the appeals filed by the assessee directed against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax- 7, Pune [‘the CIT(A)] dated 04.06.2019 for the assessment years 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →