M/S. THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,BHALKI vs. THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTELLIGENCE AND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee intended to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Therefore, it was deemed purposeless to keep the appeals pending.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the penalty levied under Section 271FA of the Income Tax Act. The assessee expressed an intention to settle the disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be kept pending when the assessee intends to settle the dispute under a tax settlement scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B.R.BASKARAN
Date of hearing : 29.09.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 29.09.2020 O R D E R
Per N.V.VASUDEVAN, VICE-PRESIDENT:
The assessee has filed these appeals challenging common order dated 13.5.2019 passed by the CIT(A)-13, Bengaluru confirming levy of penalty under Sec.271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). These appeals relate to AY 09-10 to 14-15 corresponding to Financial year 2008-09 to 13-14.
At the time of hearing of this appeal, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has filed a Memo dated 29.9.2020 wherein it has been mentioned that the appellant is seriously contemplating to settle the disputes in these appeals under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 and has made a prayer for adjourning the matter so that the process completed under the aforesaid Scheme is completed. Accordingly the assessee has prayed for adjournment of these appeals. to 1542/Bang/2019 M/S.The Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Since the assessee is opting for settlement under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant has to withdraw the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee is contemplating to file necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly we dismiss all these appeals of the assessee. The assessee is however given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if due to other circumstances and if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on this 29th day of September, 2020.
More judgments on Section 271FA
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1258/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1257/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sub-Registrar Office Siyana, Siyana vs Joint Director of Income Tax, I&Ci, KanpurITA 6467/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs ITO, Ward 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2592/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2022-2023
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs JCIT(I & Ci) - 1, KolkataITA 2591/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026