RASHMI RAJRATTAN MOHATTA,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT PALGHAR CIRCLE-, PALGHAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 977/MUM/2020Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 December 2020AY 2007-082 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's withdrawal request due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Departmental Representative did not oppose the prayer.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed a withdrawal letter stating the matter is settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed before the ITAT can be withdrawn when the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘D’ BENCH, MUMBAI

O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP : 1. The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

2.

Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.

3.

There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn.

Assessment Year: 2007-08 Page 2 of 3 4. In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. 5. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court today on the 31st day of December, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →