SHRI S. NAVEEN, L/R. OF SHRI S. SRIDHARAN,TRICHY vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 2 (1), TRICHY

PDF · subscribers
ITA 411/CHNY/2020Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 June 2021AY 2005-063 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore it if the Vivad se Vishwas application is rejected. It also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The assessee sought to settle the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and obtained Form No. 3.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The implications of the scheme on pending appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, JCIT
Hearing: 21.06.2021Pronounced: 21.06.2021

आदेश/ O R D E R

PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 1, Trichy in dated 23.01.2020 for the assessment year 2005-06.

2.

The above case was heard through video conferencing. At the time of hearing, it is noted that the learned counsel for the assessee has submitted a letter dated 04.05.2021 mentioning that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed Form No. 1 and Form 2 and obtained Form No. 3 from the designated authority.

3.

The Bench has considered the material. Since the assessee has already obtained Form No.3 and seeks withdrawal of appeal, therefore, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to restore the appeal, in the event of the designated authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act. We, further make it clear that if the assessee has for any reason opted out from the scheme or the applicant under the scheme misrepresent any fact which resulted in rejection of application filed under the scheme, then the provisions of section 4(6) of the Act, shall be applicable to all such appeals and in such cases, all the proceedings and the claims which were withdrawn under section 4 and all the consequences under the Income Tax Act against the declarant shall be deemed to have been revived. We, further make it clear that the assessee should promptly inform the Assessing Officer about their decision to opt out of the scheme or rejection of application by the designated authority to the Assessing Officer, so as to enable to file miscellaneous application to restore the appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 21st June, 2021 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 4

All 1,145 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →