INDO TECH TRANSFORMERS LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT COMPANY CIRCLE II(3), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2360/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 June 2021AY 2011-123 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee can approach the Tribunal again if any injustice arises from the settlement.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of the tax dispute. The Designated Authority issued Form No. 3 for this settlement.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN

Hearing: 29.06.2021Pronounced: 29.06.2021

M/s. Indo Tech Transformers Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner of Sr No.153-210, Illuppapattu Village, Income Tax, Near Rajakulam, Vs. Company Circle-II(3), Chennai Bangalore Highway, Chennai. Kancheepuram, Chennai – 631 561. [PAN: AAACI 5775P] (अपीलाथ(/Appellant) ()*थ(/Respondent) अपीलाथ( की ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate )*थ( की ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. R. Anita, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 29.06.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2021 आदेश / O R D E R PER SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai in dated 01.06.2018 relevant to the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2 -: 2. When this appeal is taken up for hearing, vide letter dated 29.06.2021, the learned Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has also submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

3.

On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the assessee.

4.

We have heard both the sides through video conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.

5.

In this case, the assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, it prayed that it may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

6.

In view of the submissions of the assessee, the appeal filed by the assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application 3 -: in the event of any injustice caused to the assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 29th June, 2021 in Chennai. (एस. जयरामन) (वी दुगा" राव) (V. DURGA RAO) (S. JAYARAMAN) लेखा सद" /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक "याियक सद"य सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER सद"य चे"ई/Chennai, "दनांक/Dated: 29th June, 2021. EDN, Sr. P.S

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →