M/S. UMBEL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 7(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that since the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, they were not interested in prosecuting the pending appeals. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. During the hearing, the assessee's representative stated that they had opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the ITAT appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ B ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K
O R D E R PER SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against different orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Bangalore. Since common issue is involved in these appeals, they are heard together and consolidated order is passed for the sake of convenience. The relevant Assessment Years are 2013-14 & 2014-15.
At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that these assesses have opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, ld. AR submitted that these appeals may be dismissed with the 2 & 1331/Bang/2019 liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with law, if the assesses intended to do so.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the assesses have to withdraw the pending appeals after filing the Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter the assesses are required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Ld. DR submitted that the Form No.3 shall be issued to the assesses in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assesses may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assesses, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeals.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the assessee is interested in not prosecuting these appeals filed before the Tribunal. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping the appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assesses as withdrawn. Further the assesses are at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assesses intends to do so.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026