M/S. ABHAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3(2)(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1152/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 September 2020AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal decided that keeping such appeals pending would serve no purpose. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if they opted out of the scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee sought to keep the appeal in abeyance as they had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020, and had filed initial forms. However, the department had not yet issued the final form.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for a settlement scheme like Vivad Se Viswas Act, and the implications of dismissing such an appeal with liberty to recall.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI A. K. GARODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

Hearing: 28.09.2020Pronounced: 30.09.2020

O R D E R PER ARUN KUMAR GARODIA, A. M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the order of learned CIT (A) – 3 Bengaluru dated 20.03.2019.

2.

In course of hearing, learned AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail benefit of Vivad Se Viswas Act 2020 and has already filed Form 1 & 2 but Form 3 is still awaited from the department and therefore, this appeal may be kept in abeyance. He submitted a letter dated 28.09.2020 in this regard. At this juncture, the bench pointed out that this bench is taking a consistent view that under these facts, no purpose will be served by keeping such appeals pending and therefore, such appeals are being dismissed as withdrawn and liberty is being granted to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee does not finally opt for this scheme or opts out of that scheme for any reason or there is any problem under that Act. In reply, learned AR of the assessee submitted that if such liberty is granted then he has no objection to dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn with such liberty.

3.

Learned DR of the revenue had no objection about this proposition put forward by the bench. Hence, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn and grant liberty to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee at some stage before completion of the formalities under that Act to opts out of that scheme under Vivad Se Viswas Act or there is any problem under that Act. 4. In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →