M/S. DIKSHA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), BENGALURU
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn based on the assessee's submission regarding the Vivad Se Vishwas application. Liberty was granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the final assessment order for AY 2013-2014. The assessee later filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for dispute settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for dispute resolution under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE
O R D E R
Per George George K, JM :
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 06.10.2017 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.
The learned AR has furnished a letter dated 09th October, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee has filed application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form No.3 is awaited. It was further stated that the appeal may be treated as withdrawn with liberty to apply for a recall, if Form 1 & 2 filed by the assessee is not accepted by the Department for any reason.
The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard.
2 IT(TP)A No.2615/Bang/2017 M/s.Diksha Technologies Pvt.Ltd. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In view of the submission of the learned AR in his letter dated 09.10.2020, we dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recalling the present order in accordance with law, if assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed, as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026