M/S. VMA SHIVALAYAM KAILAYAM TRUST,SALEM vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD, SALEM
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal permitted the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their scheme applications were rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment year 2015-16. At the time of hearing, the assessees informed the tribunal that they had availed the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' to settle their disputes.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn by the assessees who have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
आदेश /O R D E R Per G Manjunatha, AM: These appeals filed by different assessees are directed against orders of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai / Salem even dated 15.07.2019 / 21.06.2019 for assessment year 2015-16.
2 & 308/Chny/2020 (VSVS) 2. At the outset, we find that the appeal filed by the assessee in is time barred by limitation for which necessary petition for condonation of delay along with affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay has been filed. The ld. counsel submitted that assessee could not file appeal within the time allowed under the Act, therefore delay may be condoned. Having heard both sides and considered the petition filed by the assessee for condonation of delay, we are of the considered view that reason given by assessee for not filing the appeal within the time allowed under the Act comes under reasonable cause as provided under the Act for condonation of delay and hence, delay in filing of above appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication.
We have heard the counsels for the assessees and the ld. DR and also perused the materials available on record. At the time of hearing, learned counsels for the assessees have filed a letter along with Form No.3 issued by the Department under ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ and submitted that the assessees have availed the VSVS scheme to settle their pending disputes. The ld.counsels for the assessees further submitted that the Department has accepted applications filed by the assessees and issued Form 3 quantifying amount of taxes payable under VSVS scheme. Therefore, the ld.counsels for the assessees submitted that the assessees may be permitted to withdraw
3 & 308/Chny/2020 (VSVS) the appeals. The ld.DR on the other hand has no objection for withdrawing appeals filed by the assessees. Therefore, considering the fact that the assessees have filed application for withdrawal of appeals and have also filed Form 3 issued by the Department, we dismiss the appeals filed by the assessees as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the assessees to restore the appeals, in case the application filed by the assessees before the Designated Authority, is rejected for any reason.
In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 6th July, 2021 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026