RAMAKRISHNA PARAMAHAMSA KALLURI,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(3)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee intended to withdraw the appeals once Form 3 was issued. Since the assessee had opted for the scheme, keeping the appeals pending served no purpose.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and filed applications under the scheme. The assessee sought an adjournment of the appeal pending receipt of Form 3, which would confirm the tax liability.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be adjourned pending the issuance of Form 3 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, or dismissed as withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
None mentioned
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B.R.BASKARAN
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President
The assessee has filed the appeal against the order dated 06.11.2019 of CIT(Appeals)-2, Bengaluru, relating to assessment year 2005-06.
The Assessee has filed a Memo dated 11.09.2020 wherein it has been mentioned that the appellant has filed Form 1 and 2 under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 with respect to above appeals and Form 3 is awaited. In the Memo there is a prayer for adjourning the matter and that once Form-3 is issued, the Assessee will be withdrawing the above appeals filed before the Tribunal. Accordingly, the assessee has prayed for adjournment of these appeals.
The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV-1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. She submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly she submitted that these appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We heard Ld D.R and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly we dismiss this appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
The assessee has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department. Hence the assessee has sought adjournment till the time Form no.3 is received from the department, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeals, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on this 5th day of October, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026