M/S. INDECA SPORTING GOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The assessee was granted liberty to seek recall of the order if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. The assessee had also filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for dispute settlement. The assessee requested an adjournment pending the finalization of the Vivad Se Vishwas settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order dated 16-10-2017 passed by the assessing officer for assessment year 2012-13 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income- tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] in pursuance of directions given by Ld Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
The assessee has furnished a letter dated October 05, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee has filed application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form no.3 is awaited. Accordingly, the assessee has prayed that the appeal may be adjourned.
IT(TP)A No.2811/Bang/2017 Indeca Sporting Goods Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
Page 2 of 3 3. The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal. The Ld D.R further submitted that, in this types of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order, if the appeal is dismissed by the bench.
We heard the parties and perused the record. The submissions made by Ld D.R is considered. Since the assessee has already filed applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said Act, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
The Ld A.R has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department and the process will be completed upon receipt of Form no.3, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
IT(TP)A No.2811/Bang/2017 Indeca Sporting Goods Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 3 of 3 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 5th Oct, 2020.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026