SRI HARALURU RAGHURAMA REDDY DIWAKAR,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CIRCLE - 4(3)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the submissions and noted that the assessee had applied under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging an order from the CIT(A). The assessee had also filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and was awaiting Form No. 3.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be adjourned or dismissed as withdrawn given the assessee's application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
O R D E R
PER GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 31.03.2019 passed by the CIT(A), Bengaluru-9 for assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short].
The assessee has furnished a letter dated October 07, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee has filed application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form no.3 is awaited. Accordingly, the assessee has prayed that the appeal may be adjourned.
The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal. The Ld D.R further submitted that, in this type of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order, if the appeal is dismissed by the bench.
We heard the parties and perused the record. The submissions made by Ld D.R is considered. Since the assessee has already filed applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said Act, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
The Ld A.R has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department and the process will be completed upon receipt of Form no.3, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 8th Oct, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026