A RAYMOND FASTENERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-8, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that a similar issue for a prior assessment year had been restored to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication. Following this precedent, the Tribunal restored the current appeal's main issue to the AO/TPO for fresh determination.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the assessment order which increased its total income by making an adjustment for international transactions related to management support services. The core issue was whether these services were genuinely received and if the payment was at arm's length.
What were the issues?
Whether the international transactions for management support services were genuine and if the arm's length price was correctly determined. The appeal also questioned the initiation of penalty and levy of interest.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 144B,Section 92C,Section 271(1)(c),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI, AM
आदेश की प्रधतधलधप अग्रेधषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A)-National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi. 4. The CIT-3, Pune. धवभागीय प्रधतधनधध, आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, “सी” बेंच, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “C” Bench, Pune. गार्ा फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, 6. // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
A Raymond Fasteners India P.Ltd., . S.No. Details Date Initials 1 Draft dictated on 02.09.2022 2 Draft placed before author 06.09.2022 Draft proposed & placed before the Second 3 Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on 7 Date of uploading of Order 8 File sent to Bench Clerk 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026