PREETI SUNIL PARDESHI,MUMBAI vs. ITO-29(2)(5), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's withdrawal letter and the fact that the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was opted for. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2007-08. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and received the relevant form.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2007-08, contests the order of learned first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal.
The registry has placed on record assessee’s letter dated 23/12/2020 wherein it has been submitted that the assessee has already opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme) and received Form No.3 issued by Ld. Pr. CIT, Mumbai – 17. The Ld. DR did not object to the same.
2 Preeti Sunil Pardeshi Assessment Year: 2007-08
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of this appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.
The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 04th January, 2021. /- (Amarjit Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) "ाियक सद" / Judicial Member लेखा सद" / Accountant Member मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated : 04/01/2021 Sr.PS, Sudip Sarkar/Sr.PS, JaisyVarghese
आदेशकी"ितिलिपअ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant
""थ"/ The Respondent 2. आयकरआयु"(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. आयकरआयु"/ CIT– concerned 4. िवभागीय"ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड"फाईल / Guard File 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026