JAYBHARAT TEXTILES & REAL ESTATE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 5(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal treated the appeal as dismissed and withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee to seek restoration if the Vivad Se Viswas declaration is later declared bad in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the impact of the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme on the pending appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-53/DCCC-5(3)/IT-181/2016-17 dated 15/12/2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 23/03/2016 by the ld. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-5(3) (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Jaybharat Textiles & Real Estate Ltd.
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 26/10/2020 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/01/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 12/01/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Jaybharat Textiles & Real Estate Ltd.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026