M/S. ZINKA LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 7(1)(2), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal decided that keeping such appeals pending would serve no purpose. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if they did not opt for the scheme or faced issues with it.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Viswas Act 2020 but had not yet made a final decision. The assessee requested the appeal be kept in abeyance.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal should be kept in abeyance when the assessee intends to opt for a tax settlement scheme. The procedure for recalling an order in such circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A. K. GARODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
O R D E R PER ARUN KUMAR GARODIA, A. M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the order of CIT (A) 7, Bengaluru dated 29.10.2019.
In course of hearing, the employee of the assessee (treated as learned AR of the assessee) appeared and submitted that the assessee wants to avail benefit of Vivad Se Viswas Act 2020 but final decision in this regard is yet to be taken and therefore, this appeal may be kept in abeyance. At this juncture, the bench pointed out that this bench is taking a consistent view that under these facts, no purpose will be served by keeping such appeals pending and therefore, such appeals are being dismissed as withdrawn and liberty is being granted to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee does not finally opt for this scheme or opts out of that scheme for any reason or there is any problem under that Act. In reply, learned AR of the assessee submitted that if such liberty is granted then he has no objection to dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn with such liberty.
Learned DR of the revenue had no objection about this proposition put forward by the bench. Hence, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn and grant liberty to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee at some stage before completion of the formalities under that Act decides to opt out of that scheme under Vivad Se Viswas Act or there is any problem under that Act. 4. In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026