R.V. DEVRAJ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided that keeping the appeals pending would serve no purpose. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if they opt out of the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020, and had filed an application. However, the certificate from the PCIT was yet to be received. The assessee requested the appeals be kept in abeyance.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals should be kept pending for availing the Vivad Se Viswas Act benefit, or dismissed with liberty to recall.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A. K. GARODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
O R D E R PER BENCH : These three appeals are filed by the assessee and the same are directed against a combined order of CIT (A) VI, Bengaluru dated 29.12.2011.
In course of hearing, learned AR of the assessee appeared and submitted that the assessee wants to avail benefit of Vivad Se Viswas Act 2020. She also pointed out that in this regard, her colleague Smt. Pratibha R., Advocate has already sent a Mail on 29.09.2020 to the tribunal in which, it is stated that the assessee has filed an application to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Viswas Scheme but the assessee is yet to receive the certificate from the PCIT – 5, Bangalore. She submitted that therefore, these appeals may be kept in abeyance. At this juncture, the bench pointed out that this bench is taking a consistent view that under these facts, no purpose will be served by keeping such appeals pending and therefore, such appeals are being dismissed as withdrawn and liberty is being granted to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee does not finally opt for this scheme or opts out of that scheme for any reason or there is any problem under that Act. In reply, learned AR of the assessee submitted that if such liberty is granted then she has no objection to dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn with such liberty.
Learned DR of the revenue had no objection about this proposition put forward by the bench. Hence, we dismiss these three appeals as withdrawn and grant liberty to the assessee to approach this tribunal for recall of this order u/s 254 (2) of I T Act in case the assessee at some stage before completion of the formalities under that Act decides to opt out of that scheme under Vivad Se Viswas Act or there is any problem under that Act. 4. In the result, these three appeals of the assessee are dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026