SRI SUBBAIAH NARAPPA SRINIVASAM,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(2)(3), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 687/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 November 2020AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee would withdraw the pending appeals in due course after filing the Vivad Se Vishwas application. Therefore, keeping the appeals pending would serve no purpose.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The assessee informed the tribunal that they were in the process of filing an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for dispute settlement.

What were the issues?

Whether pending appeals should be kept alive when the assessee intends to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE

Before: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, VP & Shri Chandra Poojari, AM

Hearing: 03.11.2020

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.795/Bang/2019
ITA No.687/Bang/2019

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari, AM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the two different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment years are 2014-2015 and 2015-2016.

2.

At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee furnished a letter dated 03rd November, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee is in process of filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute, and accordingly, he prayed that the appeals may be adjourned.

3.

The learned Departmental Representative, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the to the Department. He submitted that Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and 2 & 687/Bang/2019 Sri.Subbaiah Narappa Srinivasan. accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee in any case is required to withdraw the appeals. The learned DR further submitted that in this type of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order if the appeal is dismissed by the Bench.

4.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The submissions made by the learned DR is considered. Since the assessee is in process of filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Hence, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. Since we have dismissed the appeals, the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →