M/S. IAEC INDUSTRIES MADRAS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and directed the CIT(A) to condone it. The CIT(A) was further instructed to adjudicate the appeal on its merits after providing the assessee with a proper hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 33 days. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of delay without considering the merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was justifiable and whether the appeal should be decided on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 9, Chennai, dated 06.06.2019 relevant to the assessment year 2007-08.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that there is a delay in filing the appeal and not considered the appeal on merits and prayed that the short delay may be condoned.
On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the order passed by the ld. CIT(A).
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. Against the additions towards cessation of liability as well as long term capital gains on sale of land, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) with a delay of 33 days in filing the appeal. The assessee has filed an affidavit to condone the delay before the ld. CIT(A). However, the ld. CIT(A) has neither condoned the delay nor adjudicated the appeal on merits. We have gone through the affidavit filed by the assessee and find that there is sufficient cause to condone the delay. Under the above facts and circumstances, we direct the ld. CIT(A) to condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits by affording meaningful opportunities of being heard to the assessee. Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on the 19th August, 2021 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026