Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC-I”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 08.02.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2014-15.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the Ld. A.R. submitted a letter requesting for adjournment of the case as the assessee has gone into for Vivad Se Vishvas Scheme under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020, therefore, the case may kindly be adjourned.
Since the assessee has gone into for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020, the adjournment application by the assessee is rejected. Besides, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High
2 Shri Dileep Madgavkar Court Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT TCA No.372 of 2020 with the liberty to assessee to get this appeal recalled in case assessee does not succeed in VSVS 2020. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 02.02.2021.