NIBR BULLION P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 3, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5525/MUM/2011Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 February 2021AY 2009-104 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, following a Madras High Court decision. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if the Vivad Se Vishwas declaration was not accepted.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The ITAT noted that the assessee had filed an application under this scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI JUSTICE P P BHATT & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta
For Respondent: Shri Tharian Oommen
Hearing: 09/02/2021Pronounced: 09/02/2021

आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):

1.

This appeal in A.Y.2009-10 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-36, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-36/AP.244/2010-11 dated 30/05/2011 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 31/12/2010 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle-3, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

2.

We find that ld. AR filed a letter mentioning that assessee had preferred to opt for direct tax „Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme‟-2020 and Form No.3 issued by the competent authority is placed on record.

3.

We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. Since, the assessee had already filed an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme Act 2020”, there is no need to keep the appeal pending before us in view of the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein the Hon‟ble High Court after considering the intention of the assessee to avail the benefit of „Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020‟ (VSV scheme), had dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under:-

“7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.

8.

In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.

9.

With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”

4.

In the light of the view taken by Hon‟ble Madras High Court cited (supra), we also give liberty to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that the assessee does not succeed on the declaration filed by the assessee under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020”. In other words if the assessee‟s declaration filed is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason whatsoever, the assessee can make a prayer before the Bench for recalling of the order by filing a miscellaneous application for restoration of appeal. The Registry will place such petition before the Bench concerned.

5.

In view of the aforesaid observations, we dismiss this appeal with a liberty to get it recalled in the eventuality of assessee‟s declaration not getting accepted by the Revenue. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in open Court on 09/02/2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →