M/S BOBBA AVIATION CARGO AND GROUND HANDLING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issues in the appeals had been settled under the MAP. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against final orders of assessment for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The issues raised in these appeals were settled under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) with the USA.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement of issues under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President These are appeals by the assessee against the final orders of assessment passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] relating to assessment years 2011-12 & 2012-13.
At the time of hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee filed a letter seeking to withdraw the appeals as the issues raised in the appeals have been settled under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under Article 27 of the Convention between the Government of United States of America and the Republic of India for the avoidance of double taxation and the IT(TP)A Nos.447/B/17 & 605/B/2016 Page 2 of 2 prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026