GANASHAKTI TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(Exemptions) as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant-trust to point out any infirmity. The appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The appellant-trust applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, citing that the trust runs a daily newspaper on a commercial basis and for political interests.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust's activities of running a newspaper on a commercial basis and for political interests disqualify it from obtaining registration under Section 12A/12AA of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Ganashakti Trust………………………..…………………….……Appellant 74A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700016. [PAN: AACTG6269K] vs. CIT(Exemptions), Kolkata…………..………........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 09, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : December 09, 2021 Hearing through Video Conferencing ORDER
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-trust against the order dated 26.03.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(Exemptions)’] passed u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) rejecting the application of the appellant-trust for registration u/s 12A of the Act. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant-trust despite notice. A 2. perusal of the file records show that no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant-trust for the last many dates despite notice. Therefore, we proceed to adjudicate the present appeal after hearing the ld. DR. 3. A perusal of the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(Exemptions) reveals that the appellant-trust runs a daily newspaper on commercial basis. He has further observed that the newspaper is being published for political interests also. The Ld. CIT(Exemptions) therefore, rejected the application for registration u/s 12AA of the Act. No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant-trust nor there is any document on the file to point
I.T.A. No.1025/Kol/2018 Ganashakti Trust out any infirmity in the order of the CIT(Exemptions). We therefore confirm the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemptions). The appeal of the appellant-trust is hereby dismissed. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed. Kolkata, the 9th December, 2021. Sd/- Sd/- [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 09.12.2021. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Ganashakti Trust 2. CIT(Exemptions), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR),
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Sanjeevini Health Care vs. M/S.Vijayalakshmi And AssociatesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Trilok Chandra vs. State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Basant Ballabh Punetha vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Satyavan vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026