KIRAN DEVI,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON NCORPORATE WARD-5(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, allowing the assessee to utilize the Vivas se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeal if the scheme application is rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivas se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal to avail the Vivas se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Chennai in dated 19.11.2019 for the assessment year 2012-13.
At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee inviting our attention to the letter dated 17.08.2021 submitted that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘ Vivas se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed Form No. 1 and Form 2 and obtained Form 3 from the designated authority. Therefore, the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. We heard the Ld. DR also.
The Bench has considered the material. Since the assesee submits that he has obtained Form No. 3 and seeks withdrawal of appeal, therefore, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However liberty is given to the assessee/Revenue to restore the appeal, in the event of the designated authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026