MR. JASMAIL SINGH,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3(3)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee would move an application for withdrawing the appeal. Since the assessee had already filed applications under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee's authorized representative requested the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘B’ : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
O R D E R PER SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, A.M. : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Bangalore Dt.09.11.2018. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld. CIT (Appeals).
At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. The learned Authorised Representative filed a letter stating that the assessee has opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, placed in the file. The ld. AR submitted that the appeal may be dismissed in view of withdrawing the appeal.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeal after filing the Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Ld. DR submitted that the Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We have heard the ld. DR and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. Further the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026