HOK DESIGN AND PLANNING SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 14(2)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal treated the appeal as dismissed and withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee to seek restoration if the Vivad Se Viswas declaration is later declared bad in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the impact of the assessee's enrollment in the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme on the pending appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in 443/Mum/2020 for A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-22/ACIT-14(2)(1)/IT-10279/2016-17 dated 25/10/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 29/03/2016 by the ld. ACIT, Circle – 14(2)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Hok Design and Planning Services India Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 08/02/2021 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/02/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 12/02/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Hok Design and Planning Services India Pvt. Ltd.,
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026