SMT. PUJA SURESH PUNAMIYA,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24 (3)(4), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the declaration under the scheme was not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the first appellate authority for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2014-15 contest the order of learned first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal
2. The Ld. Counsel for assessee, at the outset, vide letter dated 13/11/2020, submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 for the year under consideration by filing Form Nos.1 & 2 and therefore, the appeal may be treated as withdrawn. The Ld. DR did not object to the same.
3. In view of foregoing, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.
4. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 12th February, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (Amarjit Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) �ाियक सद� / Judicial Member लेखा सद� / Accountant Member मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated :12/02/2021 Sr.PS, Kasarla Thirumalesh आदेशकी�ितिलिपअ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 1. ��थ�/ The Respondent 2. आयकरआयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. आयकरआयु�/ CIT– concerned 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड�फाईल / Guard File 6.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026