No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-4/E-Filing-117/ACIT 16(1)/2016-17 dated 17/04/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated
M/s. Disney Broadcasting (India) Ltd., 27/12/2016 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax-16(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter through email dated 13/02/2021 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 16/02/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 16/02/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Disney Broadcasting (India) Ltd.,