SHARAD NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD -2, SANGLI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 706/PUN/2022Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 November 2022AY 2018-194 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the interest income earned by the cooperative credit society from cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in similar cases.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Cooperative Credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from cooperative banks. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction, treating the interest as income from other sources.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a cooperative credit society from cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL

For Appellant: Shri Amit Sudhir Shintre
For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 28-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act.) in relation to the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The only issue raised herein is against not allowing deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) on the interest income earned from Cooperative banks and Societies.

Sharad Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit

3.

The factual matrix of the case is that the assessee is the Cooperative Credit society registered under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1912. A return was filed claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) amounting to Rs.67,74,783/-, which was restricted to the extent of gross total income amounting to Rs.47,63,695/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) held the interest income of Rs.50,12,157/- earned from Cooperative banks as falling under the head ‘Income from other sources” and hence, ineligible for deduction. The ld. CIT(A) accorded his imprimatur to the point of view canvassed by the AO. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has approached the Tribunal.

4.

After considering the rival submissions and perusing the relevant material on record, it is observed that the assessee is a Cooperative Credit society and earned interest income from Cooperative banks. The claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) has been disallowed by the AO treating such income as falling under the head ‘Income from other sources’ instead of ‘Profits and Gains of business or profession’ as claimed by the assessee. The ld. AR has Sharad Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit brought to my notice copies of certain orders passed by the Pune Bench of the Tribunal on this issue accepting the assessee’s claim. One of such orders is Rena Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs. Pr.CIT (ITA No.1249/PUN/2018).

1.

Vide order dated 07-01-2022, the Tribunal accepted the claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) under similar circumstances. No contrary order has been brought to my notice by the ld. DR. In view of the facts and respectfully following the decision of the Division Bench, I overturn the impugned order and direct to grant deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) on the amount of interest income under consideration.

5.

In the result, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 07th November, 2022.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपा�य�/ VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 07th November, 2022 Satish

Sharad Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

All 2,440 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →