MAHARASHTRA ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11 (1), PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought to withdraw the appeal as the CIT(A)'s directions had been complied with by the Assessing Officer. The Revenue did not dispute these developments.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. During the pendency of the appeal, the CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to verify certain issues and grant relief. The Assessing Officer subsequently passed an order giving effect to the CIT(A)'s directions.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, given the subsequent actions taken by the lower authorities to resolve the dispute.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA & SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
