ELCOME TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (OSD), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they have opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The tribunal acknowledged this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for the assessment year 2010-11. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN.
Assessee by : Ms. Shreya Jain Revenue by : Shri Susheel Kumar Mishra सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 17/02/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 17/02/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the Assessment Order dated 30/10/2014 passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA & r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2010-11.
A letter dated 22/01/2021 has been received from the assessee stating that the assessee has opted for ‘Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’( in short ‘VSVS’) and hence, want to withdraw the appeal.
आअसं. 580/मुं/2015 (�न.व.2010-11) (A.Y.2010-11
Shri Susheel Kumar Mishra, representing the Department stated that the Department has no objection if the assessee want to withdraw appeal to avail the benefit of ‘VSVS’.
A perusal of above letter shows that the assessee’s declaration under VSVS for the impugned assessment year has been accepted and the Designated Authority has issued Form-3. In view of above, the appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on Wednesday, the 17th day of February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026