TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(4), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee would be filing an application to withdraw the appeal. Therefore, it was deemed purposeless to keep the appeal pending. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2004-2005. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel informed the tribunal that the assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for dispute settlement and requested an adjournment.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The procedural requirement for withdrawing a pending appeal after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE
Before: Shri George George K, JM & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM
O R D E R
Per George George K, JM
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 29.07.2016. The relevant assessment year is 2004-2005.
At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee has furnished a letter dated 16th December, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee has opted for filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, for settlement of the dispute, and accordingly, she prayed that the appeal may be adjourned.
The learned Departmental Representative, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeal after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the to the Department. He submitted that M/s.Tejas Networks Limited. Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee in any case is required to withdraw the appeal. The learned DR further submitted that in these types of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order if the appeal is dismissed by the Bench.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The submissions made by the learned DR is considered. Since the assessee has opted for filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Hence, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. Since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Siddharth Barai (Prop- Siddharth Design Studio) vs. The Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, Balangir RangeOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Sanjeevini Health Care vs. M/S.Vijayalakshmi And AssociatesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Trilok Chandra vs. State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Basant Ballabh Punetha vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026