SITARAM CHAUDHARY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 5(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with a condition. The assessee has the liberty to approach the tribunal for restoration if the matter is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The assessee informed the tribunal that they have filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and are awaiting resolution.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, with provisions for revival.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM
स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAPC8653P (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: Ms. Varsha Bhatter Revenue by: Shri T. S. Khalsa (Sr. AR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 24/02/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 24/02/2021 आदेश / O R D E R
PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.03.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 53 Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”]. Relevant to the A.Y.2015-16.
We have heard the arguments advanced by the Ld. Representative of the parties and perused the record. When this appeal was called out for hearing, the ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that he has filed the necessary declaration under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and is awaiting for final resolution of the matter under the said scheme. He submitted that upon completion of the necessary formalities, he will withdraw the appeal. In response to the suggestion from the Bench, he fairly accepted that he has no objection to the appeal being dismissed as withdrawn as long as his right for revival of the appeal is protected, in the event of, for some unfortunate reason, the matter being not settled under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
The Ld. DR has no objection to the above.
In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to be rider that in the unlikely event of matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of his appeal.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026