DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S BENCHMARK COMPUTER SOLUTION PVT. LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty. It reasoned that the additions were estimated and did not constitute concealment or inaccurate particulars. Furthermore, the revenue's appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer levied a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for alleged bogus purchases. The CIT(A) deleted the penalty, holding that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The revenue appealed this deletion.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is leviable on estimated additions for unproved purchases and if the revenue's appeal is maintainable based on the tax effect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
1 M/s. Benchmark Computer Solution Pvt. Ltd. Assessment Year: 2011-12 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Pr.CIT- 9(2)(1) M/s. Benchmark Computer Solution Pvt. Ltd. Room No.655A, 6th Floor Unit-2, Second Floor, Jyoti Wire House बनाम Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road Plot No.23A, Shah Industrial Estate / Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Veera Desai Road, Andheri (W) Mumbai-400 058 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCB-3357-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Tharian Oommen- Ld. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 22/02/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 03/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026