M/S KONGSBERG DIGITAL SOFTWARE AND SERVICES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and was therefore withdrawing the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging an assessment order. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the AO for the assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C of the Act in pursuance of directions given by Ld Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
IT(TP)A No.2056/Bang/2017 M/s. Kongsberg Digital Software and Services Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 2 of 2 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute in its appeal under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. It is further stated that the assessee has filed Form No.1 & 2 for the appeal filed by the assessee and it has also received Form No.3. Accordingly it is submitted that appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.
We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. Since the issues contested in the appeal of the assessee have been settled under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2010, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we give liberty to the assessee to seek recall of this order in accordance with law, if the circumstances so warrant.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 31st Dec, 2020
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026