M N DASTUR & CO. PV TLTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee would withdraw the appeals after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Therefore, keeping the appeals pending would serve no purpose.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to settle disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The assessee requested an adjournment to file the necessary applications.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be adjourned or dismissed as withdrawn given the assessee's decision to settle under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE
Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R Per George George K, JM These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against four different orders of the CIT(A), all dated 29th December, 2017. The relevant assessment years are 2010- 2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014.
At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee has furnished letter dated 04th January, 2021, wherein it is stated that the assessee has opted for filing the applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, for settlement of the dispute, and accordingly, he prayed that the appeals may be adjourned.
2 M/s.M.N.Dastur & Co.Pvt.Ltd.
The learned Departmental Representative, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the to the Department. He submitted that Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee in any case is required to withdraw the appeals. The learned DR further submitted that in these types of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order if the appeal is dismissed by the Bench.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The submissions made by the learned DR is considered. Since the assessee has opted for filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Hence, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. Since we have dismissed the appeals, the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026