M/S ACT DIGITAL HOME ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 439/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 January 2021AY 2012-133 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee intended to withdraw the appeals as part of the Vivad Se Vishwas settlement process. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee to seek recall of the order if necessary.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel stated that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the ITAT appeals should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE

Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM

Hearing: 12.01.2021

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.439/Bang/2018
ITA No.440/Bang/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

O R D E R Per George George K, JM These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against two separate orders of the CIT(A), both dated 27.09.2017. The relevant assessment years are 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.

2.

At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that the assessee has opted for filing applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, for settlement of the dispute, and accordingly, he prayed that the appeals may be adjourned.

3.

The learned Departmental Representative, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending

1.

2 M/s.ACT Digital Home Entertainment Pvt.Ltd. appeal after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the to the Department. He submitted that Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee in any case is required to withdraw the appeals. The learned DR further submitted that in these types of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order if the appeal is dismissed by the Bench.

4.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The submissions made by the learned DR is considered. Since the assessee has contemplated for filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Hence, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. Since we have dismissed the appeals, the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →