DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S NCR CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that keeping the appeals pending would serve no purpose as the disputes were settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed three appeals against the assessee for assessment years 2005-06, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The assessee had opted to settle the contested issues under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as the assessee has settled the disputes under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The condition for recall of the order if the settlement fails was also considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The revenue has filed these three appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2010-11 and 2011-12. The appeal for AY 2005-06 has been filed challenging the order dated 18-06-2012 passed by Ld CIT(A)-IV, Bangalore. The appeals for other two years have been filed against the assessment orders passed by the AO in pursuance of directions given by Ld Dispute Resolution Panel (Ld DRP).
The assessee has submitted that it has opted to settle the issues contested by the revenue for the above said three years under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has filed Form 1 and 2. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has also received Form no.3 for all the three years. Accordingly he submitted suitable orders may be passed. The Ld A.R also submitted that the Bangalore bench of Tribunal is dismissing the appeals in such kind of cases giving liberty to seek recall of the order.
The Ld D.R, submitted that the appeals have been filed by the revenue and hence, if the appeals are dismissed and if something goes wrong with the applications filed by the assessee for settlement of disputes, then the revenue should be given liberty to file applications seeking recall of the order. The Ld D.R further submitted that the assessee should be directed to intimate the AO about the results of the applications filed by it and if they do not go
IT(TP)A Nos.1036/Bang/2012 IT(TP)A No.325/Bng/2015 & IT(TP)A No.277/Bng/2016 M/s. NCR Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 3 of 4 through as desired by the assessee, then the assessee should persuade the AO to file necessary applications seeking recall of this order within the statutory time limit prescribed under the Act.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has already filed applications under VSVS Act for all the three years, we are of the view that no purpose would be served in keeping these appeals pending, since the present appeals have to be withdrawn by the revenue once the dispute is settled under the above said Act. Accordingly, we dismiss all the three appeals of the revenue.
However, we find merit in the submissions made by Ld D.R. Since these appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed by us at the instance of the assessee, we direct the assessee to persuade the AO to file necessary applications for recall of this order in accordance with law within the statutory time period, if something goes wrong in respect of applications filed by the assessee under VSVS Act.
In the result, all the three appeals of the revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th Jan, 2021
Sd/- Sd/- (George George K.) (B.R. Baskaran) Judicial Member Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated 28th Jan, 2021. VG/SPS
IT(TP)A Nos.1036/Bang/2012 IT(TP)A No.325/Bng/2015 & IT(TP)A No.277/Bng/2016 M/s. NCR Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 4 of 4
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026