MAJOR BRANDS (INDIA) LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 10(3)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3358/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 March 2021AY 2010-114 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, following the decision of the Madras High Court, granted liberty to the assessee to restore the appeals if the declaration under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme is not in their favour. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020. The appeals were pending before the ITAT for disposal. The assessee requested withdrawal of appeals with liberty to restore them.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, with liberty to restore them if the scheme's outcome is unfavorable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Katira, AR
Hearing: 17.03.2021Pronounced: 17.03.2021

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No. 3358/Mum/2019
ITA No. 3359/Mum/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आदेश / O R D E R भहावीय स िंह, उऩाध्मक्ष के द्वाया / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP: These appeals of assessee are arising out of the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-17, Mumbai, [in short

2.

At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee Shri Kalpesh Katira stated that the assessee has opted for ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’. The appeals before ITAT were filed on 20.05.2019 and the appeals are pending for disposal. The assessee has filed copy of Form No. 3 for both the years. Hence, he has requested for permission for withdrawal of the appeals subject to liberty to be granted to him. The Sr. learned DR Shri Vidhyadhar V has not objected for the same.

3.

After hearing both the sides and perusing the records, it is noticed that the assessee is opting for ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme- 2020’. In view of the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in I.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein Hon'ble High Court after considering the intent of the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ has dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under: - “7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is

8.

In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.

9.

With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →