What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed the necessary declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently submitted a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.

Shree Ramdev Metal Mart vs ACIT | ITAT Mumbai 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH&

Hearing: 19/03/2021Pronounced: 19/03/2021

आदेश / O R D E R

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 24.06.2019 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 3, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT (A)”] relevant to A.Y. 2011-12.

At the outset, when the appeal was called out for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the assessee in spite of calls. Vide letter dated 08.03.2021, assessee submitted that it has filed the necessary declaration under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and confirmed the receipt of Form-3 and prayer to withdraw the appeal. 3. The Ld. DR also did not object to course so suggested.

Shree Ramdev Metal Mart 4. In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn based on the letter submitted before us and assessee has filed the relevant Form No. 3 under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, 2020.

SHREE RAMDEV METAL MART,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 19 (3), MUMBAI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments