SMT. PURUSHOTHAMAN NISHA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-9, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Subsequently, as the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and the Department issued Form 3, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal which was time-barred by 122 days. The assessee later opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the dispute. The Department issued Form 3 under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE- & SHRI G.MANJUNATHA
order passed by the learned CIT(A)-10, Chennai dated 31.01.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.
At the outset, we find that the appeal filed by the assesseeis is time barred by 122 days for which necessary petition for condonation of delay explaining reasons for the delay has been filed. The learned AR for the assessee submitted that assessee could not file appeal within the time allowed under the Act, therefore delay may be condoned.
Having heard both the sides and considered the petition along with affidavit filed by the assessee for condonation of delay, we are of the considered view that reasons given by assessee for not filing appeal within the time allowed under the Act comes under reasonable cause as provided under the Act for condonation of delay and hence, delay in filing of above appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication.
We have heard learned counsel for the assessee and learned DR and also perused the materials available on record.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee has filed a letter along with Form No.3 issued by the Department under ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ and submitted that the assessee has availed the VSVS scheme to settle its pending disputes. The ld. counsel for the assessee further submitted that the Department has accepted application filed by the assessee and issued Form 3 quantifying amount of taxes payable under VSVS scheme. Therefore, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld. DR, on the other hand, has no objection for dismissing the appeal as the Designated Authority has issued Form 3. Therefore, considering the fact that the assessee has filed application for withdrawal of appeal and has also filed Form 3 issued by the Department, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the assessee to restore the appeal, in case the application filed by the assessee before the Designated Authority, is rejected for any reason.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026