DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. BOSE CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged that the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit and that the CBDT circular was applicable to pending appeals. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee pointed out that the tax effect involved in the appeal was below Rs. 50 Lacs, which is the revised monetary limit for filing appeals by the Revenue as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect and the applicability of the revised CBDT monetary limit for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘I-1’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI R.K.PANDA
The appeal filed by Revenue is directed against the order dated 28.01.2015 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(5) of the Income tax Act, 1961 r.w. Rule 13 of DRP Rules 2009 for the assessment year 2010-11.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset, pointed out that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is below Rs.50 Lacs.
Therefore, in view of the latest CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, raising the monetary limit to Rs.50 Lacs for filing appeal by the Revenue which is even applicable to all pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable and has to be dismissed.
ITA No:- 1672/Del/2015 (Assessment Year: 2010-11)
Ld.DR fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is below Rs.50 Lacs.
The CBDT vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals before the Tribunal to Rs.50 Lacs.
Further, CBDT vide Instruction dated 20.08.2019 has also clarified that Circular No.17/2019 would be applicable to all pending appeals. In such circumstances, the present appeal filed by the Revenue in case of low tax effect is not maintainable.
Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution of the appeal, if the requisite material is brought to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para 10 of the Circular dated 11.07.2018.
In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019 and subsequent instruction dated 20.08.2019 (supra), the captioned appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 26th February, 2020.
More judgments on Section 144C(5)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026