DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 6(1)(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S. SSRB FOOD PROCESSING PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Therefore, keeping the appeal pending would serve no purpose. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-15. The assessee opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, to settle the dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH “ B ” : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAIShri Muzaffar Hussain, CIT (D.R) Smt. Lalitha Rameswaran, C.A.
O R D E R PER SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, A.M. : This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Bangalore dt.26.03.2019 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
At the outset, the learned Authorised Representative submitted vide letter dt.14.01.2021 that the assessee has opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, ld. AR submitted that the Revenue’s appeal may be dismissed with the liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with law, if the Department intended to do so.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the assessee could initiate to withdraw the pending appeal after filing the Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Ld. DR submitted that the Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the Revenue may be dismissed as withdrawn, if the assessee comply the requirement.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Since the assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, to settle the dispute on the issue involved in this appeal. We are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the revenue as withdrawn. Further the Department is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the revenue intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. Sd/- Sd/- (SMT. BEENA PILLAI) (CHANDRA POOJARI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 21.01.2021. *Reddy GP
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026