SHRI RUPEN ANANTRAY SHETH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 19(3)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5463/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 April 2021AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the declaration under the scheme was not accepted.

What were the facts?

The assessee had opted for settlement of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Consequently, the assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal filed before the tribunal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Vajani-Ld. AR
For Respondent: Ms. Smita Verma – Ld. Sr. DR

Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →